Selected work
Bettermode logo
B2B SaaS · Community platform · 2024-2025

Winning the answer,not the ranking

Took a B2B SaaS platform to first-position visibility inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overview, while qualified leads grew 60% year over year.

AI search (GEO/AEO)Paid acquisitionLifecycleAttribution
#0
Organic and AI-search visibility in its category
+0%
Qualified leads, year over year
+0%
ICP lead growth
0% → 0%
Churn
The situation

Buyers had started asking assistants instead of searching. A category page that ranked third on Google could be invisible in an AI answer, and nobody on the team could see that happening because no tool reported it.

The pipeline problem underneath was ordinary: leads were coming in, but too few of them looked like the ideal customer, and the ones who converted were churning faster than the model assumed.

What I did
  • Treated answer engines as their own channel rather than a side effect of SEO. Structured content so a model could lift a correct, attributable answer out of it, and tracked citation presence across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overview as a reportable metric.
  • Rewrote acquisition around ICP fit instead of raw volume, then ran the paid, SEO and lifecycle programs myself rather than briefing them out.
  • Rebuilt onboarding and retention campaigns against the churn cohorts, and owned the reporting (MQL, CPA, ROAS, churn) so the trade-offs were visible when budget moved.
What happened

First-position organic and AI-search visibility in the category across all four answer surfaces. Qualified leads up 60% year over year, ICP leads up 95%, LTV/CAC held above 5, churn down from 3.5% to 2.7%.

Category visibility across answer enginesposition at handover
ChatGPT
#1
Perplexity
#1
Gemini
#1
AI Overview
#1
The receipts

Answer-engine visibility measured in Profound for the week of 8 to 15 October 2025, against a tracked prompt set of community-platform queries: the head term, its long-tail variations, and the competitor and alternatives questions buyers actually type. Profound scores all of it against the community management software category. Both numbers are here, not only the flattering one.

Visibility score, share of AI answersfirst of five · 8-15 Oct 2025
Bettermode47.2% +9.9Mighty Networks39.7% -15.3Circle37.3% -2.3Higher Logic31.8% +7.6Gainsight22.4% +14.8
Rank by topic, against community management software brandsleader on five of nine
Community Platform#1leaderCommunity Building#1leaderBranded and white label#1leaderModern UX and no-code#1leaderPlatform extensibility#1leaderAnalytics and ROI measurement#2Customer engagement#3Customer advocacy#4Customer retention#5
Average position when cited, lower is betterseventh · the half still open
Gainsight2.5Mighty Pro2.8Circle2.8Mighty Networks2.9Bettermode3.0 7th

What these numbers do not say

This is category visibility, not the whole internet. The prompt set is community-platform queries and their variations, so first place means first among community management software brands for the questions a buyer in that market asks. That is the number worth having, and it is also the number worth stating precisely.

Being cited most often is also not the same as being cited first. Bettermode led on how often it showed up and sat seventh on where it showed up inside the answer. Frequency is the thing I moved, and it compounds, because an engine that never mentions you cannot rank you at all. Position is the harder, slower half and it was still open when I left. Anyone quoting a single answer-engine number at you is picking whichever one flatters them.

Source screenshots, Profound, 8-15 October 2025
Profound Answer Engine Insights for Bettermode. Visibility score 47.2 percent, up 9.9. Visibility score rank number 1, up two places. Ranked list: Bettermode 47.2 percent, Mighty Networks 39.7, Circle 37.3, Higher Logic 31.8, Gainsight 22.4.
Visibility score: first in the category. Bettermode appeared in 47.2% of AI-generated answers across the tracked prompt set, ahead of every competitor measured, and up 9.9 points week on week.
Profound visibility rankings by topic, Bettermode compared to community management software brands. Bettermode is ranked first and marked Leader on Community Platform, Community Building, Branded and white label, Modern UX and no-code, and Platform extensibility. It is second on Analytics and ROI measurement, and lower on Customer advocacy, engagement and retention.
First on the topics that decide the category. Profound marks Bettermode Leader and ranks it first on Community Platform itself, plus Community Building, Branded and white label, Modern UX and no-code, and Platform extensibility. Second on analytics, and further down on customer engagement and retention, where Mighty Networks leads.
Profound average position for Bettermode. Average position 3, ranked seventh, behind Gainsight at 2.5, Mighty Pro at 2.8, Circle at 2.8 and Mighty Networks at 2.9.
Average position: seventh. When Bettermode did appear, it sat third in the answer on average, behind four competitors that appeared less often but placed higher.
The call that mattered

Ranking first and being cited are different jobs. Optimising a page to rank will not get it quoted, because a model is looking for an extractable, self-contained claim it can attribute. That distinction was worth more than any keyword decision I made that year.

Movement over the engagementpercent change
Qualified leads YoY+60ICP lead growth+95Churn reduction+23
Straight answer

Why the ICP work moved fast

Two years before Bettermode I had built a gated B2B community platform from scratch, for wholesale jewellery buyers. I had been the customer for this category before I was the marketer of it, so I did not have to learn what a community platform is for, or why a trade audience logs into one.